Evaluating the Impact of Airway Devices and Ventilation Strategies on Atelectasis: Insights from Recent Research

Introduction

Atelectasis, or the collapse of lung tissue, is a common and potentially serious complication associated with anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. It can result from various factors including airway management strategies and ventilatory settings. Traditionally, endotracheal tubes (ETTs) have been the gold standard for airway management during surgery, but recent studies suggest that supraglottic airways (SGAs) might offer benefits in certain scenarios. This article reviews recent research comparing ETTs and SGAs, focusing on their impact on atelectasis, and discusses the role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and postoperative interventions in managing this complication.

Comparison and Substantiation

1. Impact of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) A systematic review and meta-analysis by Yang et al. (2021) demonstrated that PEEP significantly reduces the incidence of atelectasis in mechanically ventilated patients, with an odds ratio of 0.46 (95% CI: 0.31-0.67, P<0.0001) ([1]). PEEP’s effectiveness in preventing atelectasis highlights its importance in ventilatory management. Although this study did not compare ETTs with SGAs directly, it underscores the role of PEEP in reducing atelectasis regardless of the airway device used. Similarly, a randomized controlled trial by Yang and Zhang (2009) found that in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, the use of 10 cm H2O PEEP improved oxygenation and reduced atelectasis scores compared to lower levels of PEEP ([2]). This study reinforces the importance of PEEP in preventing atelectasis, even though it did not directly address the comparison between ETTs and SGAs.
2. Role of Postoperative Rehabilitation Postoperative rehabilitation interventions, such as breathing exercises, have been shown to reduce the incidence of atelectasis and improve lung function. The systematic review and meta-analysis by Liu et al. (2023) found a significant reduction in atelectasis (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.18-0.67, P=0.67) with postoperative breathing exercises ([3]). These findings suggest that postoperative care plays a crucial role in managing atelectasis, independent of the airway device used during surgery.
3. Comparison of SGAs and ETTs Direct comparisons between SGAs and ETTs offer insights into their respective impacts on pulmonary complications. A randomized controlled trial by Smith et al. (2023) comparing SGAs and ETTs in older patients undergoing elective non-cardiothoracic surgery found that SGAs were associated with fewer postoperative pulmonary complications, including coughing (19.5% vs 25.1%, risk ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.89, p < 0.001) ([4]). Although this study did not specifically report atelectasis, it suggests that SGAs may be associated with fewer overall pulmonary complications. Another systematic review and meta-analysis by Wang et al. (2016) comparing SGAs and ETTs in laparoscopic surgery found no significant differences in oxygenation or gastric insufflation between the two devices. However, SGAs were associated with fewer instances of laryngospasm, cough, sore throat, and hoarseness ([6]). This indicates that SGAs might reduce some airway-related complications, though direct evidence regarding atelectasis was not provided. A retrospective cohort study by Lee et al. (2021) highlighted that SGAs were associated with a lower risk of emergent postoperative intubation compared to ETTs (adjusted absolute risk difference = 0.80%, 95% CI 0.64-0.97, P<0.001) ([5]). While this study did not directly address atelectasis, it suggests that SGAs could be linked to better overall respiratory outcomes. Conversely, a study protocol by Zhang et al. (2022) aims to compare the effects of LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) and ETT on atelectasis using lung ultrasound scores. Though results are pending, this trial promises to provide direct evidence on the effects of different airway devices on atelectasis ([8]).
4. Other Considerations Research comparing SGA and ETT in specific contexts, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy by Zhang and Wu (2022) and sinonasal surgery by Jackson et al. (2018), has generally found comparable ventilatory parameters and similar outcomes regarding oxygen desaturation ([9], [12]). These studies suggest that SGA might be a viable alternative to ETT, especially in terms of airway placement and minimizing hemodynamic responses.

Conclusion

The current body of research suggests that while PEEP is a crucial factor in reducing atelectasis, the choice between ETT and SGA also impacts pulmonary outcomes. SGAs may be associated with fewer airway-related complications and better overall respiratory outcomes in some cases. However, the direct comparison of ETTs and SGAs regarding atelectasis specifically remains limited. Ongoing and future studies, such as the randomized controlled trial protocol comparing LMA and ETT on atelectasis, will be valuable in providing more direct evidence.

In practice, anesthesiologists should consider individual patient factors, surgical context, and the potential benefits of different airway devices and ventilatory strategies to optimize outcomes and minimize the risk of atelectasis.

References

1. Yang, W., et al. (2021). Systematic review and meta-analysis on perioperative intervention to prevent postoperative atelectasis complications after thoracic surgery. Annals of Palliative Medicine.
2. Yang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Intraoperative ventilatory strategies for prevention of pulmonary atelectasis in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesthesia and Analgesia.
3. Liu, X., et al. (2023). The effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation interventions that include breathing exercises to prevent pulmonary atelectasis in lung cancer resection patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulmonary Medicine.
4. Smith, J., et al. (2023). Postoperative pulmonary complications in older patients undergoing elective surgery with a supraglottic airway device or tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia.
5. Lee, A., et al. (2021). Supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation and the risk of emergent postoperative intubation after general anaesthesia in adults: a retrospective cohort study. British Journal of Anaesthesia.
6. Wang, J., et al. (2016). Comparison between supraglottic airway devices and endotracheal tubes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine.
7. Sharma, R., et al. (2023). Supraglottic airway devices versus endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic surgeries: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.
8. Zhang, L., et al. (2022). The effects of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube on atelectasis in patients undergoing general anesthesia assessed by lung ultrasound: A protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial. PloS One.
9. Zhang, H., & Wu, Y. (2022). The Comparison Between Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube With Respect to Adequacy of Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study, and Comparative Study. Asian Journal of Anesthesiology.
10. Hsu, C., et al. (2012). Atelectasis and perioperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.
11. Lee, S., & Chen, R. (2005). Pulmonary atelectasis: a pathogenic perioperative entity. Anesthesiology.
12. Jackson, T., et al. (2018). Randomized controlled trial comparing the supraglottic airway to use of an endotracheal tube in sinonasal surgery. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology.
13. Patel, N., et al. (2019). Supraglottic airway versus endotracheal tube during interventional pulmonary procedures – a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiology.
14. Zhang, H., et al. (2017). The Effects of Endotracheal Tube and i-gel® Supraglottic Airway Device on Respiratory Impedance: A Prospective Observational Study. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.